Google Tech Talks October 31, 2008 ABSTRACT The C++ language has started the formal approval process with the recent release of its Committee Draft, ie Beta. This talk outlines the process, the new features, some features left out, and the procedures for formal comments. Speaker: Matt Austern Matt Austern is a long-time contributor to the C++ standard, as well as a Google engineer. Speaker: Lawrence Crowl Lawrence Crowl is a long-time contributor to the C++ standard, as well as a Google engineer.
25 thoughts on “An Overview of the Coming C++ (C++0x) Standard”
Leave a Reply to aardbeias Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
To think I learn this language when researching about game engines.
I still prefer the original standard though i do like the look of some C++0x features.
@Borbuster
Dude, C++ is for real harcore developer’s, like myself :).
but java is good to,not better.
2 best things about c++0x
[1] lambdas
[2] leet name
★★★★★
drdobbs . com /cpp/218600111
@vorbeigehende Waah! I kinda liked concepts! I thought this would solve some duplication problems I see with a lot of libraries that try to avoid dependencies.
At the July 2009 meeting in Frankfurt, Germany, the C++ Standards Committee voted to remove “concepts” from C++0x.
the kid to the left keeps messing with his pc lol
Woops, my mistake. 😛
No, ‘if (pred(*first)’ should be ‘if (pred(*first))’. I was talking about parenthesis () not braces {}. I know that you don’t need braces for single statements.
Loll there’s no opening parenthesis either. Parenthesis are not require for one-line if statement bodies.
29:14 – the if statement is missing a closing parenthesis
guy at 30 mins sounds sooo much like a woman. ughhhh lol
hahah 😛
16:15 – reguralize…
And adds megabytes of bloat to the fat guy you have just created!
Wtf? The C++ standard library is very lean and fast, especially compared to stuff like Java.
“significantly expended standard library” – oh dear, the fat guy has put on more weight!
D programming language.
C++0x is ugly
lol … it’s not a reference !! slap !!
I would much prefer the confidential matters.
detached threads 🙂
very cool stuff, but the presenter sucks!